Christina Almeida v. Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTINA ALMEIDA
Defendant / Appellee: NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of Social Security and NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security
Case Number: 19-15958
Filed: May 3, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2019 Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: SL) Appellants motion to dismiss this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [11310889] (OC) [Entered: 05/28/2019 04:09 PM]
May 24, 2019 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Christina Almeida Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 05/24/2019. [11308925] [19-15958] (Kaplan, Jesse) [Entered: 05/24/2019 02:07 PM]
May 22, 2019 Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the Ninth Cir. Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See FRAP 33 & Ninth Cir.R. 33-1. Mediation assessment conferences are not routinely scheduled in social security appeals. Csl are encouraged to contact circuit mediator if they believe this social security appeal has remand potential or is otherwise amenable to resolution. Specifically, csl are requested to contact the mediator if claimant has been awarded benefits after the district court's decision or if claimant is deceased. The mediator can also assist csl with procedural matters that may lead to the resolution of an appeal. Csl for the party contacting the Mediation Program are encouraged to copy csl for the other party to the appeal on any such requests. Info regarding the medation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [11305652] (CL) [Entered: 05/22/2019 11:19 AM]
May 3, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/10/2019. Appellant Christina Almeida opening brief due 07/02/2019. Appellee Nancy A. Berryhill answering brief due 08/02/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11286723] (RT) [Entered: 05/03/2019 06:38 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Christina Almeida v. Nancy Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHRISTINA ALMEIDA
Represented By: Jesse S. Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Edward Alan Olsen Esquire
Represented By: Margaret Branick-Abilla Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security
Represented By: Edward Alan Olsen Esquire
Represented By: Margaret Branick-Abilla Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?