Shannon Williams v. Anthony Verna, et al
| PAUL COPENHAVER |
| BROWN and ANTHONY VERNA |
| SHANNON WILLIAMS |
| 19-15978 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| SHANNON WILLIAMS V. ANTHONY VERNA, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): To date, appellant has not complied with the courts May 8, 2019 order to complete and file with this court the enclosed prisoner authorization form. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall sign and file with this court the enclosed prisoner authorization form. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The briefing schedule established previously remains in effect. The Clerk shall send a copy of the May 8, 2019 order to appellant along with this order. [11338897] (CKP) [Entered: 06/20/2019 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11290579] (CKP) [Entered: 05/08/2019 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Shannon Williams opening brief due 07/05/2019. Appellees Brown and Anthony Verna answering brief due 08/05/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11289173] (JMR) [Entered: 05/07/2019 11:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
