Jan Van Dusen v. Catherine Purcell, et al
| MONTIE S. DAY |
| TERESE LAUBSCHER, Probation Deputy of the State Bar of California, DONALD F. MILES, Hearing Judge, Los Angeles, JUDITH A. EPSTEIN, Review Judge, San Francisco, YVETTE D. ROLAND, Hearing Judge, Los Angeles, HEATHER ABELSON, Attorney, State Bar of California, W. KEARSE MCGILL, Hearing Judge, Los Angeles, LUCY ARMENDARIZ, Supervising Hearing Judge, San Francisco, PATRICE E. MCELROY, Hearing Judge, San Francisco, JAIME SAUCEDO, Investigator, State Bar of California, DAVID J. PASTERNAK, President of the Board of Trustees of the State Bar of California, RICHARD A. HONN, Review Judge, Los Angeles, RONALD W. STOVITZ, Pro Tem Review Judge, San Francisco, CATHERINE D. PURCELL, Presiding Judge of the State Bar Court, San Francisco, JAYNE KIM, Chief Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California, TERRIE GOLDADE, Supervising Attorney, Office of Probation, State Bar of California, ROBERT A. HENDERSON, Supervising Senior Trial Counsel, State Bar of California and JOSEPH CARLUCCI, Office of Enforcement, State Bar of California |
| JAN VAN DUSEN |
| 19-15984 |
| May 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jan Van Dusen Motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 05/29/2019. Date of service: 07/04/2019. [11354505] [19-15984] (Van Dusen, Jan) [Entered: 07/04/2019 02:43 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jan Van Dusen Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis; includes statement that appeal should go forward. Date of service: 07/04/2019. [11354504] [19-15984]--[COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect content of filing. 07/05/2019 by NAC] (Van Dusen, Jan) [Entered: 07/04/2019 12:26 AM] |
| Filing 5 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 19-15984: Due] ). [11321641] (CO) [Entered: 06/06/2019 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has denied appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis status on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11312059] (CKP) [Entered: 05/29/2019 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 05/17/2019. [11307789] (NAC) [Entered: 05/23/2019 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11294725] (CKP) [Entered: 05/13/2019 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jan Van Dusen opening brief due 07/08/2019. [11290538] (JPD) [Entered: 05/08/2019 11:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
