Brenda Biebrich, et al v. Colleen O'Donnell-Smith, et al
| BRENDA BIEBRICH and HEIDI DAVIS |
| SHARON HERNDON, REBEKAH SCOTT, COLLEEN O'DONNELL-SMITH and JENNIFER HUNTER |
| 19-15999 |
| May 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MGS) : Appellants have failed to comply with the courts order filed May 20, 2019. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Ninth Cir. Rule 42-1. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [11334786] (RT) [Entered: 06/17/2019 05:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellants have filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellants shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [11302403] (LW) [Entered: 05/20/2019 09:44 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/17/2019. Transcript ordered by 06/10/2019. Transcript due 07/08/2019. Appellants Brenda Biebrich and Heidi Davis opening brief due 08/19/2019. Appellees Sharon Herndon, Jennifer Hunter, Colleen O'Donnell-Smith and Rebekah Scott answering brief due 09/16/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11293127] (JPD) [Entered: 05/10/2019 10:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
