David Hunter v. Carolyn Fetch, et al
Defendant / Appellee: SACRAMENTO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Probation illegal warrant and CAROLYN FETCH
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Case Number: 19-16006
Filed: May 13, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 Filing 10 Filed Appellant David Sampson Hunter motion to remand case . Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/27/2019. [11351454] (CW) [Entered: 07/02/2019 07:13 AM]
June 17, 2019 Filing 9 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant David Sampson Hunter opening brief (Informal: Yes) 6 pages. Served on 06/05/2019. Major deficiencies: motion for IFP pending. [11337954] (SML) [Entered: 06/19/2019 04:22 PM]
June 10, 2019 Filing 8 Filed Appellant David Sampson Hunter letter dated 06/05/2019 re: statements regarding mail fraud. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11329673] (CW) [Entered: 06/13/2019 10:29 AM]
June 7, 2019 Filing 7 Filed Appellant David Sampson Hunter letter dated 06/01/2019 re: claims of stealing, embezzlement from prison canteen. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11323642] (CW) [Entered: 06/07/2019 02:03 PM]
June 7, 2019 Filing 6 Filed Appellant David Sampson Hunter motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/01/2019. [11323607][COURT UPDATE: Correct Document Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 06/07/2019 by BY] (CW) [Entered: 06/07/2019 01:46 PM]
June 6, 2019 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11321719] (CKP) [Entered: 06/06/2019 10:01 AM]
June 6, 2019 Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 19-16006: Due] ). [11321633] (CO) [Entered: 06/06/2019 09:23 AM]
June 3, 2019 Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 06/03/2019 revoking ifp, appeal frivolous. [11317027] (CW) [Entered: 06/03/2019 11:13 AM]
May 28, 2019 Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11310258] (CKP) [Entered: 05/28/2019 12:31 PM]
May 13, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant David Sampson Hunter opening brief due 05/17/2019. [11294554] (JPD) [Entered: 05/13/2019 10:29 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Hunter v. Carolyn Fetch, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SACRAMENTO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Probation illegal warrant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CAROLYN FETCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Represented By: David Sampson Hunter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?