Sharon Beck v. State of California, et al
| ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JAMES A. COX, Honorable, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC GUARDIAN |
| SHARON KATHRYN BECK |
| 19-16058 |
| May 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN and PAUL J. WATFORD) The request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 3 ] and [ # 4 ]) is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012). All pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11348208] (OC) [Entered: 06/28/2019 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Sharon Kathryn Beck ex parte motion for emergency relief, request for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/17/2019. [11336095] (RL) [Entered: 06/18/2019 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Sharon Kathryn Beck amended petition for habeas corpus/emergency relief requested. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/12/2019. [11330366] (QDL) [Entered: 06/13/2019 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Sharon Kathryn Beck motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/20/2019. [11304146] (JMR) [Entered: 05/21/2019 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 04/09/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11304135] (JMR) [Entered: 05/21/2019 10:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
