John Davis v. Paul Penzone, et al
| VAIL, A2985, Jail Commander Captain at MCSO, MICHAEL, B1619, Custody Bureau Hearing, Sergeant at MCSO, MICELI, A4983, ISD/ASD Executive, Lieutenant at MCSO, KINDELL-HOUSE, B3914, Inmate Legal Service Supervisor at MCSO, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as A9229, Shift Commander Lieutenant at MCSO and UNKNOWN PARTY, named as B1255, Inmate Legal Service Clerk at MCSO |
| MIKELS, B1619, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as B1132, Detention Officer Sergeant at MCSO, MURPHY, A5255, Custody Bureau Hearing Sergeant at MCSO, YOUNG, B0909 Detention Officer, Sergeant at MCSO, SMITH, A7808, Bureau Hearing Commander, Lieutenant at MCSO, ZIEGLAR, B2578, Inmate Telephone System Administrator at MCSO, PAUL PENZONE, Jail Commander, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as B1151, Jail Commander Designee Sergeant at MCSO, HARSHA, A5064, Jail Commander Designee, Captain at MCSO, BROWN, B1753, Jail Commander Designee Sergeant at MCSO, SMITH, B3719, Detention Officer at MCSO, GARCIA, Shift Commander, Lieutenant at MCSO, WEST, B0253, Detention Officer Sergeant at MCSO and BALLARD, A9229 |
| JOHN LEO DAVIS |
| 19-16070 |
| May 22, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant John Leo Davis (Informal: Yes) opening brief of 16 pages. Served on 06/03/2019. [11345182] (KWG) [Entered: 06/26/2019 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND) A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court granted appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and that such permission has not been revoked. Accordingly, appellants in forma pauperis status continues in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is therefore unnecessary. The court has filed appellants completed prisoner authorization form. Appellants motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is denied. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of this denial shall be filed or entertained. The Clerk shall file the opening brief received on June 10, 2019 (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]). Because there is no appearance by appellees, briefing will be completed upon the filing of the opening brief. [11344865] (JBS) [Entered: 06/26/2019 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 7 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11328117] (CKP) [Entered: 06/12/2019 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 6 Received original and 7 copies of Appellant John Leo Davis opening brief (Informal: Yes) 16 pages. Served on 06/03/2019. Major deficiencies: motion pending. [11327187] (KWG) [Entered: 06/11/2019 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant John Leo Davis motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/03/2019. [11325628] (QDL) [Entered: 06/10/2019 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant John Leo Davis motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/03/2019. [11325624] (QDL) [Entered: 06/10/2019 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 06/04/2019. [Case Number 19-16070: Partially Paid] [11325617] (QDL) [Entered: 06/10/2019 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11310256] (CKP) [Entered: 05/28/2019 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant John Leo Davis opening brief due 07/19/2019. (No appearance for Appellees, no answering brief deadlines set) [11305511] (HC) [Entered: 05/22/2019 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
