Justin Rider v. David Tristan, et al
| JACQUES GRAHAM, STACY BARRETT, BRENT ELMORE, DAVID FIERRO, DAVID TRISTAN, JUSTIN GORDON, JENNIFER NASH and DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden |
| JUSTIN RIDER |
| 19-16117 |
| May 31, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Attorney Jared M. Frost in 19-16117 substituted by Attorney Frank Anthony Toddre II in 19-16117 [11317599] (RR) [Entered: 06/03/2019 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Frank A. Toddre II for Appellants Stacy Barrett, Brent Elmore, David Fierro, Justin Gordon, Jacques Graham, Jennifer Nash, Dwight Neven and David Tristan. Substitution for Attorney Jared M. Frost for Appellants Stacy Barrett, Brent Elmore, David Fierro, Justin Gordon, Jacques Graham, Jennifer Nash, Dwight Neven and David Tristan. Date of service: 06/03/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11317046] [19-16117] (Toddre, Frank) [Entered: 06/03/2019 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLEE. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 07/01/2019. Transcript due 07/29/2019. Appellants Stacy Barrett, Brent Elmore, David Fierro, Justin Gordon, Jacques Graham, Jennifer Nash, Dwight Neven, Warden and David Tristan opening brief due 09/09/2019. Appellee Justin Rider answering brief due 10/09/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11315026] (RT) [Entered: 05/31/2019 10:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
