Rene Cabrera, et al v. Google LLC
Plaintiff: RICK WOODS, individually and on behalf of Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee: GOOGLE LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant: RENE CABRERA
Case Number: 19-16120
Filed: May 31, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2019 Filing 11 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court has entered final judgment, and that appellant has appealed that judgment in appeal No. 19-16466. Accordingly, it appears that this appeal is duplicative of appeal No. 19-16466. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed as duplicative. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11379144] (AF) [Entered: 07/29/2019 09:58 AM]
July 23, 2019 Filing 10 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11374101] (BS) [Entered: 07/23/2019 03:42 PM]
July 22, 2019 Filing 9 Streamlined request [8] by Appellant Rene Cabrera to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Rene Cabrera opening brief due 10/09/2019. Appellee Google LLC answering brief due 11/08/2019. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11370858] (BG) [Entered: 07/22/2019 09:05 AM]
July 22, 2019 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Rene Cabrera. New requested due date is 10/09/2019. [11370726] [19-16120] (Joseph, Gregory) [Entered: 07/22/2019 08:00 AM]
June 19, 2019 Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 07/23/2019, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 07/15/2019 ). [11337165] (BS) [Entered: 06/19/2019 11:41 AM]
June 13, 2019 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 07/15/2019, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 06/26/2019 ). [11330547] (BS) [Entered: 06/13/2019 03:15 PM]
June 11, 2019 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 06/26/2019, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11326673] (BS) [Entered: 06/11/2019 11:37 AM]
June 7, 2019 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee Google LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/07/2019. [11323820] [19-16120] (Falk, Donald) [Entered: 06/07/2019 03:10 PM]
June 7, 2019 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/07/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11323466] (AD) [Entered: 06/07/2019 12:44 PM]
June 7, 2019 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Rene Cabrera Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/07/2019. [11323336] [19-16120] (Joseph, Gregory) [Entered: 06/07/2019 11:31 AM]
May 31, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/07/2019. Transcript ordered by 07/01/2019. Transcript due 07/29/2019. Appellant Rene Cabrera opening brief due 09/09/2019. Appellee Google LLC answering brief due 10/09/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11315386] (RT) [Entered: 05/31/2019 12:07 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rene Cabrera, et al v. Google LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICK WOODS, individually and on behalf of Others Similarly Situated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GOOGLE LLC
Represented By: Edward D. Johnson
Represented By: Zaneta J. Kim
Represented By: Donald Manwell Falk
Represented By: Eric Butler Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RENE CABRERA
Represented By: Joseph H. Meltzer
Represented By: Gregory P.N. Joseph
Represented By: Stacey Kaplan
Represented By: Courtney Solomon
Represented By: Jeffrey John Angelovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?