James Kelly v. P. Sullivan, et al
L. SANIAZ, J. VILLAFUERTE, P. SULLIVAN, C. MARTELLO and GUMBOA, Dr. |
JAMES CARL KELLY |
19-16125 |
June 3, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON, N. RANDY SMITH and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court has not issued any orders that are final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11348315] (WL) [Entered: 06/28/2019 10:49 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant James Carl Kelly motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/18/2019. [11317051] (JPD) [Entered: 06/03/2019 11:19 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant James Carl Kelly opening brief due 07/29/2019. [11317025] (JPD) [Entered: 06/03/2019 11:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.