Gary Easley v. City of Morgan Hill, et al
| LAURIE SMITH, City Director of Police Department, FIERRO, Morgan Hill Police Deputy, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, CATHERINE EASLEY, A private citizen of the State of California, Morgan Hill, MADISON GLOVER, A private citizen of the State of California, Morgan Hill, ROLAND BURNEY, A private citizen of the State of California, Morgan Hill, SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BRUCE CUMMINGS, Hiring & Policy supervisors for the County, Morgan Hill, MHPD & SCSD, GLOVER, Mrs - Unknown name at this time. It is belived that she is the Wife of defendant Madison Glover, CITY OF MORGAN HILL, REIS, Morgan Hill Police Deputy, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, KEN YEAGER, City Director of Police Department, MORGAN HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and DIRECTOR OF POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| GARY D. EASLEY |
| 19-16192 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): Appellants motion for an extension of time to respond to the June 25, 2019 order [ # 7 ] is granted. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall respond to the June 25, 2019 order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. [11391024] (CKP) [Entered: 08/08/2019 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Mr. Gary D. Easley motion to extend time to file motion to proceed IFP, response to court order, opening statements. Deficiencies: None. [11386309] (NAC) [Entered: 08/05/2019 07:20 AM] |
| Filing 6 Streamlined request by Appellant Mr. Gary D. Easley to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset if necessary as per order of the court. Docket [4]. [11386025] (DLM) [Entered: 08/02/2019 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 19-16192: Due] ). [11360206] (CO) [Entered: 07/11/2019 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status for this appeal because it found that the appeal was frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11343433] (CKP) [Entered: 06/25/2019 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 06/17/2019. Revoking Mr. Easley's in forma pauperis status. [11339598] (NAC) [Entered: 06/20/2019 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11328409] (CKP) [Entered: 06/12/2019 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gary D. Easley opening brief due 07/30/2019. Appellees Board of Supervisors, Roland Burney, City of Morgan Hill, County of Santa Clara, Bruce Cummings, Director of Police Department, Catherine Easley, Fierro, Glover, Madison Glover, Morgan Hill Police Department, Reis, Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department, Laurie Smith and Ken Yeager answering brief due 08/29/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11327889] (HC) [Entered: 06/12/2019 09:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
