Catrina Rodriguez v. U.S. Healthworks, Inc., et al
| DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive and U.S. HEALTHWORKS HOLDING COMPANY, INC., a business entity form unknown |
| U.S. HEALTHWORKS MEDICAL GROUP, PC, A Delaware corporation and U.S. HEALTHWORKS, INC., a Delaware corporation |
| CATRINA R. RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated |
| 19-16199 |
| June 13, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CATRINA RODRIGUEZ V. U.S. HEALTHWORKS, INC. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11368041] (CL) [Entered: 07/18/2019 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 8 Added Attorney(s) Dylan Bradley Carp for party(s) Appellee U.S. Healthworks Medical Group, PC Appellee U.S. Healthworks, Inc., in case 19-16199. [11361901] (NAC) [Entered: 07/12/2019 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Dylan B. Carp (JACKSON LEWIS P.C., 50 California Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111) for Appellees U.S. Healthworks Medical Group, PC and U.S. Healthworks, Inc.. Date of service: 07/12/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11361826] [19-16199] (Carp, Dylan) [Entered: 07/12/2019 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney Hardev Singh Chhokar for Appellees U.S. Healthworks Medical Group, PC and U.S. Healthworks, Inc., in case 19-16199. [11361126] (HH) [Entered: 07/11/2019 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Hardev Singh Chhokar (Jackson Lewis P.C., 50 California Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111-4165) for Appellees U.S. Healthworks, Inc. and U.S. Healthworks Medical Group, PC. Date of service: 07/11/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11361120] [19-16199] (Chhokar, Hardev) [Entered: 07/11/2019 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 07/18/2019, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11349437] (CL) [Entered: 06/28/2019 06:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/20/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11339915][19-16199] (AD) [Entered: 06/20/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Catrina R. Rodriguez Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/20/2019. [11339886] [19-16199] (Setareh, Chaim) [Entered: 06/20/2019 05:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/20/2019. Transcript ordered by 07/12/2019. Transcript due 08/12/2019. Appellant Catrina R. Rodriguez opening brief due 09/20/2019. Appellees U.S. Healthworks Medical Group, PC and U.S. Healthworks, Inc. answering brief due 10/21/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11329613] (JBS) [Entered: 06/13/2019 09:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
