Savannah Smith, et al v. County of Santa Cruz, et al
| NOE HERNANDEZ, Watsonville Police Officer, JIM HART, Santa Cruz County Sheriff, PEDRO ZAMORA, Capitola Police Officer, CITY OF CAPITOLA, TERRY MCMANUS, City of Capitola Police Department Chief, DAVID HONDA, City of Watsonville Police Department Chief, JACOB AINSWORTH and CITY OF WATSONVILLE |
| COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, CHRIS VIGIL, JEFFREY EISNER and EMMA RAMPONI |
| SAVANNAH SMITH, LUKE SMITH, Deceased, through his Successor in Interest, THANH-THANH HOANG, both individually and in her capacity as successor-in-interest to Luke Smith, deceased and IAN SMITH, individually and as successor in interest for Luke Smith, Deceased |
| 19-16241 |
| June 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - AssessmentConference, 09/03/2019, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedules previously set by the court remain in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11361512] [19-16241, 19-16298] (VS) [Entered: 07/12/2019 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KWH): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties shall address the basis of this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See Maropulos v. Cty. of Los Angeles, 560 F.3d 974, 975 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam) ([A]n order denying qualified immunity on the ground that a genuine issue of material fact exists is not a final, immediately appealable order.); Rodriguez v. Cty. of Los Angeles, 891 F.3d 776, 791 (9th Cir. 2018). The briefing schedule established previously remains in effect. [11360146] [19-16241, 19-16298] (WL) [Entered: 07/11/2019 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/28/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11348570][19-16241] (AD) [Entered: 06/28/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants County of Santa Cruz, Jeffrey Eisner, Emma Ramponi and Deputy Chris Vigil Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/28/2019. [11348125] [19-16241] (Blechman, Noah) [Entered: 06/28/2019 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/28/2019. Transcript ordered by 07/22/2019. Transcript due 08/19/2019. Appellants County of Santa Cruz, Jeffrey Eisner, Emma Ramponi and Chris Vigil opening brief due 09/30/2019. Appellees Thanh-Thanh Hoang, Ian Smith, Luke Smith and Savannah Smith answering brief due 10/28/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11340253] (JBS) [Entered: 06/21/2019 09:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
