Edwin Hardeman v. Monsanto Company
| EDWIN HARDEMAN |
| MONSANTO COMPANY |
| 19-16253 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| EDWIN HARDEMAN V. MONSANTO COMPANY |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): On July 9, 2019, this court issued an order staying appellate proceedings pending disposition of the motions for judgment as a matter of law and to alter judgment in the district court. A review of the record and appellants response to this courts July 9, 2019 order reflects that the district court has ruled on the post-judgment motions and, on July 17, 2019, entered an amended judgment. Accordingly, the stay is lifted, and this appeal shall proceed. Within 10 days after the date of this order, appellant shall designate any reporters transcripts or serve on appellee a statement indicating that appellant does not intend to order any transcripts. See 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1(a). If appellant designates transcripts, the transcripts will be due September 10, 2019. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due October 21, 2019; the answering brief is due November 20, 2019; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11385214] (JPD) [Entered: 08/02/2019 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: These cases are RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11384857] [19-16253, 19-16255] (CL) [Entered: 08/01/2019 05:31 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Edwin Hardeman response to Court order dated 07/09/2019. Date of service: 07/26/2019. [11377470] [19-16253] (Wagstaff, Aimee) [Entered: 07/26/2019 08:07 AM] |
| Filing 9 Terminated Jennifer A. Moore for Edwin Hardeman in 19-16253 (Due to incorrect ECF account information). [11376596] (SLM) [Entered: 07/25/2019 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 07/24/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11358878] (CL) [Entered: 07/10/2019 07:51 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of timely-filed motions listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), and that those motions are still pending in the district court. The June 20, 2019 notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the May 31, 2019 motion for judgment as a matter of law and the May 31, 2019 motion to alter judgment. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 14 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motions, appellant shall file a written notice in this court: (1) informing this court of the district courts ruling; and (2) stating whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling(s) on the post-judgment motions, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11358772] (TSP) [Entered: 07/09/2019 08:13 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/02/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11352231][19-16253] (AD) [Entered: 07/02/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Edwin Hardeman Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/02/2019. [11351959] [19-16253] (Wagstaff, Aimee) [Entered: 07/02/2019 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 4 Added attorney Aimee Wagstaff for Edwin Hardeman. [11351914] (RL) [Entered: 07/02/2019 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [11351861] (LW) [Entered: 07/02/2019 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Aimee Hall Wagstaff for Appellant Edwin Hardeman. Date of service: 07/02/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11351562] [19-16253] (Wagstaff, Aimee) [Entered: 07/02/2019 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/01/2019. Transcript ordered by 07/22/2019. Transcript due 08/19/2019. Appellant Edwin Hardeman opening brief due 09/30/2019. Appellee Monsanto Company answering brief due 10/30/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11342502] (RT) [Entered: 06/24/2019 02:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Edwin Hardeman v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: EDWIN HARDEMAN | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer A. Moore |
| Represented By: | Aimee Wagstaff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: MONSANTO COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Rakesh Kilaru |
| Represented By: | Joe Gregory Hollingsworth |
| Represented By: | Eric G. Lasker Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
