National Education Association, et al v. Betsy DeVos, et al
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and BETSY DEVOS, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education |
| SHANE HEIMAN, NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, STEPHANIE PORTILLA, KWYNN UYEHARA and CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION |
| 19-16260 |
| June 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: LK) Appellants unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [11395338] (OC) [Entered: 08/13/2019 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellants Betsy DeVos and USEDU Unopposed Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 08/09/2019. [11392056] [19-16260] (Chaifetz, Samantha) [Entered: 08/09/2019 04:04 AM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Counsel may contact circuit mediator to discuss services available through the court's mediation program, to request a settlement assessment conf, or to request a stay of the appeal for settlement purposes. Also, upon agreement of the parties, the brfing sch can be modified or vacated to facilitate settlement discussions. Csl are requested to send copies of this order to their clients. Info regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [11357771] (VS) [Entered: 07/09/2019 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/03/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11353733][19-16260] (AD) [Entered: 07/03/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellants Betsy DeVos and USEDU Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/03/2019. [11353434] [19-16260] (Chaifetz, Samantha) [Entered: 07/03/2019 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellants have filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellants shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [11353321] (LW) [Entered: 07/03/2019 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 Added attorney Samantha Lee Chaifetz for Betsy DeVos USEDU. [11352631] (RL) [Entered: 07/02/2019 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Samantha L. Chaifetz for Appellants Betsy DeVos and USEDU. Date of service: 07/02/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11352577] [19-16260] (Chaifetz, Samantha) [Entered: 07/02/2019 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/02/2019. Appellants Betsy DeVos and U.S. Department of Education opening brief due 08/23/2019. Appellees California Teachers Association, Shane Heiman, National Education Association, Stephanie Portilla and Kwynn Uyehara answering brief due 09/23/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11343680] (HC) [Entered: 06/25/2019 11:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
