Bryan Patterson v. Thomas Zewert, et al
| RANDULF FABUIZA, N.P. |
| LAWRENCE GAMBOA, M.D., FERNANDO TUVERA, M.D., M. JANSEN, Appeal Coordinator, J. VILLAFUERTE, Appeal Coordinator, LAW SAN FU, M.D., C. BOURNE, M.D., C. HERNANDEZ, Appeal Coordinator, THOMAS ZEWERT, M.D., S. PAVONG, Appeal Coordinator and EDWARD BIROSONG, D.O. |
| BRYAN DAMON PATTERSON |
| 19-16266 |
| June 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Bryan Damon Patterson FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/10/2019. [11379962] (RL) [Entered: 07/29/2019 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11345463] (CKP) [Entered: 06/26/2019 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 19-16266: Due] ). [11345049] (CO) [Entered: 06/26/2019 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Bryan Damon Patterson opening brief due 08/23/2019. Appellees Edward Birosong, C. Bourne, Lawrence Gamboa, C. Hernandez, M. Jansen, S. Pavong, Law San Fu, Fernando Tuvera, J. Villafuerte and Thomas Zewert answering brief due 09/23/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11344795] [COURT UPDATE: Reset deadlines for appellees, resent NDA]--[Edited 06/26/2019 by JMR] (JMR) [Entered: 06/26/2019 09:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
