Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: TAYLER BAYER
Defendant / Appellee: NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.
Case Number: 19-16282
Filed: June 27, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 26, 2021 TAYLER BAYER V. NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2019 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11378634] (CL) [Entered: 07/26/2019 04:35 PM]
July 12, 2019 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 07/26/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11361952] (CL) [Entered: 07/12/2019 01:23 PM]
June 27, 2019 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/27/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11346956][19-16282] (AD) [Entered: 06/27/2019 12:44 PM]
June 27, 2019 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tayler Bayer Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/27/2019. [11346914] [19-16282] (Rubin, Michael) [Entered: 06/27/2019 12:10 PM]
June 27, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/05/2019. Transcript ordered by 07/26/2019. Transcript due 08/26/2019. Appellant Tayler Bayer opening brief due 10/04/2019. Appellee Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. answering brief due 11/04/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11346552] (JBS) [Entered: 06/27/2019 09:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: TAYLER BAYER
Represented By: Michael Rubin
Represented By: Cliff Michael Palefsky Esquire
Represented By: Keith Ehrman Esquire
Represented By: Matthew John Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.
Represented By: Conor John Dale
Represented By: Katrin U. Schatz Esquire
Represented By: Mitchell Frederick Boomer Esquire
Represented By: Theodora R. Lee Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?