Albert Riley v. T. Friederichs, et al
G. KALISHER, Prison Doctor Employed with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in her Individual and Official Capacities, T. FRIEDERICHS, Prison Doctor Employed with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in his Individual and Official Capacities and Z. AHMED, Prison Doctor Employed with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in his Individual and Officals Capacities |
ALBERT LEVELL RILEY |
19-16289 |
June 28, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Albert Levell Riley (Informal: Yes) opening brief of 15 pages. Served on 08/17/2019. [11407601] (GV) [Entered: 08/22/2019 04:40 PM] |
Filing 4 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11360516] (CKP) [Entered: 07/11/2019 11:26 AM] |
Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 07/04/2019. [11359415] (NAC) [Entered: 07/10/2019 01:22 PM] |
Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11350464] (CKP) [Entered: 07/01/2019 01:07 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Albert Levell Riley opening brief due 08/26/2019. Appellees Z. Ahmed, T. Friederichs and G. Kalisher answering brief due 09/25/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11348086] (JMR) [Entered: 06/28/2019 09:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Albert Riley v. T. Friederichs, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: G. KALISHER, Prison Doctor Employed with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in her Individual and Official Capacities | |
Represented By: | Wilfred T. Fong Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: T. FRIEDERICHS, Prison Doctor Employed with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in his Individual and Official Capacities | |
Represented By: | Wilfred T. Fong Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Z. AHMED, Prison Doctor Employed with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in his Individual and Officals Capacities | |
Represented By: | Wilfred T. Fong Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: ALBERT LEVELL RILEY | |
Represented By: | Albert Levell Riley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.