William Tedards, Jr., et al v. Doug Ducey, et al
| ROSS TRUMBLE, WILLIAM PRICE TEDARDS, Jr., LAWRENCE LILIEN, MONICA WNUK and BARRY HESS |
| DOUG DUCEY, Governor of Arizona, in his official capacity and MARTHA MCSALLY |
| 19-16308 |
| July 1, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Barry Hess, Lawrence Lilien, William Price Tedards, Jr., Ross Trumble and Monica Wnuk. Date of service: 08/28/2019. [11414441] [19-16308] (Persoon, Michael) [Entered: 08/28/2019 07:25 PM] |
| Filing 18 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Barry Hess, Lawrence Lilien, William Price Tedards, Jr., Ross Trumble and Monica Wnuk. Date of service: 08/28/2019. [11414440] [19-16308] (Persoon, Michael) [Entered: 08/28/2019 07:23 PM] |
| Filing 17 Added Attorney Thomas Geoghegan for Appellants Monica Wnuk, Barry Hess, Lawrence Lilien, William Price Tedards Jr. and Ross Trumble, in case 19-16308. [11414167] (HH) [Entered: 08/28/2019 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 16 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Thomas H. Geoghegan (Despres, Schwartz, and Geoghgegan, Ltd. 77 W. Washington St, Suite 711 Chicago IL 60602) for Appellants Barry Hess, Lawrence Lilien, William Price Tedards, Jr., Ross Trumble and Monica Wnuk. Date of service: 08/28/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11414136] [19-16308] (Geoghegan, Thomas) [Entered: 08/28/2019 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 15 Filed (ECF) Attorney Mr. Michael Persoon for Appellants Barry Hess, Lawrence Lilien, William Price Tedards, Jr., Ross Trumble and Monica Wnuk response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 08/08/2019. [11391279] [19-16308] (Persoon, Michael) [Entered: 08/08/2019 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 14 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11391038] (BS) [Entered: 08/08/2019 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Attorney Mr. Dominic Draye for Appellee Doug Ducey response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 08/02/2019. [11385294] [19-16308] (Draye, Dominic) [Entered: 08/02/2019 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 12 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for November 2019 at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 immediately using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter immediately , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : File Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation). [11385089] (KS) [Entered: 08/02/2019 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellee Martha McSally response to motion ([ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 08/01/2019. [11384475] [19-16308] (Tyrrell, James) [Entered: 08/01/2019 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER, WILLIAM C. CANBY and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN): Appellants motion to expedite this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is granted. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due August 28, 2019; the answering brief is due September 27, 2019; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(a)(1). No written motions for extensions of time under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b) will be granted absent extraordinary and compelling circumstances. The Clerk shall place this appeal on the calendar for November 2019. See 9th Cir. Gen. Order 3.3.(f). [11384460] (AF) [Entered: 08/01/2019 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellee Doug Ducey response to motion ([ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 08/01/2019. [11384135] [19-16308] (Johnson, Brett) [Entered: 08/01/2019 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 08/12/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11380262] (BS) [Entered: 07/29/2019 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 7 Terminated attorney Michael T. Liburdi for appellee Doug Ducey in 19-16308. [11380161] (HH) [Entered: 07/29/2019 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Notice of withdrawal of counsel. Filed by Attorney Mr. Michael T. Liburdi for Appellee Doug Ducey. Party proceeding without counsel: No. Date of service: 07/29/2019. [11380033] [19-16308] (Liburdi, Michael) [Entered: 07/29/2019 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellants Barry Hess, Lawrence Lilien, William Price Tedards, Jr., Ross Trumble and Monica Wnuk Motion to expedite case. Date of service: 07/22/2019. [11372065] [19-16308] (Persoon, Michael) [Entered: 07/22/2019 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/16/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11365096][19-16308] (AD) [Entered: 07/16/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Barry Hess, Lawrence Lilien, William Price Tedards, Jr., Ross Trumble and Monica Wnuk Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/16/2019. [11364759] [19-16308] (Persoon, Michael) [Entered: 07/16/2019 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellants have filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellants shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [11357907] (LW) [Entered: 07/09/2019 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/08/2019. Transcript ordered by 07/31/2019. Transcript due 08/30/2019. Appellants Barry Hess, Lawrence Lilien, William Price Tedards Jr., Ross Trumble and Monica Wnuk opening brief due 10/09/2019. Appellees Doug Ducey and Martha McSally answering brief due 11/12/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11350856] (RT) [Entered: 07/01/2019 03:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
