Nikola Lovig v. Best Buy Stores, L.P., et al
| NIKOLA LOVIG |
| BEST BUY STORES, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership and BEST BUY CO., INC., a Minnesota corporation |
| 19-16338 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MANDATE ISSUED. (JSB, SSI and JBO) [11534709] (QDL) [Entered: 12/17/2019 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed order (JAY S. BYBEE, SANDRA S. IKUTA and JOHN B. OWENS) We have reviewed the responses to this courts July 30, 2019 order. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the district courts June 21, 2019 order is not a final judgment or an order that comes within the collateral order doctrine. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Metabolic Research, Inc. v. Ferrell, 693 F.3d 795, 798 (9th Cir. 2012) (discussing collateral order doctrine requirements and explaining that they are applied strictly). We therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11508814] (WL) [Entered: 11/22/2019 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc. and Best Buy Stores, L.P. reply to response to order to show cause dated 07/30/2019. Date of service: 08/30/2019. [11416631] [19-16338] (Miller, Barbara) [Entered: 08/30/2019 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Nikola Lovig response to order to show cause dated 07/30/2019. Date of service: 08/20/2019. [11404511] [19-16338] (Setareh, Chaim) [Entered: 08/20/2019 09:04 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [11397420] (CL) [Entered: 08/14/2019 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the district courts June 21, 2019 order denying appellants motion to voluntarily dismiss certain claims does not appear to be a final, appealable order. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11380888] (WL) [Entered: 07/30/2019 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 08/14/2019, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11373083] (CL) [Entered: 07/23/2019 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/15/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11364273][19-16338] (AD) [Entered: 07/16/2019 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Nikola Lovig Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/15/2019. [11364198] [19-16338] (Setareh, Chaim) [Entered: 07/15/2019 06:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 07/12/2019. [11363729] (RT) [Entered: 07/15/2019 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/15/2019. Transcript ordered by 08/07/2019. Transcript due 09/06/2019. Appellant Nikola Lovig opening brief due 10/16/2019. Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc. and Best Buy Stores, L.P. answering brief due 11/15/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11356754] (JPD) [Entered: 07/08/2019 02:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
