Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
| GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California and STATE OF CALIFORNIA |
| VIEJAS BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANS, YOCHA DEHE WINTUN NATION and SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION |
| 19-16384 |
| July 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| YOCHA DEHE WINTUN NATION V. GAVIN NEWSOM |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely-filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), and that motion is still pending in the district court. The July 11, 2019 notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the July 10, 2019 motion to alter or amend judgment. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 14 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellants shall file a written notice in this court: (1) informing this court of the district courts ruling; and (2) stating whether appellants intend to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellants must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11375933] (TSP) [Entered: 07/25/2019 06:45 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 08/07/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in these matters are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedules remain in effect... [11373914] [19-16384, 19-16422] (VS) [Entered: 07/23/2019 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/19/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11370459][19-16384] (AD) [Entered: 07/19/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians and Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/19/2019. [11370416] [19-16384] (Yost, Paula) [Entered: 07/19/2019 05:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/19/2019. Appellants Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians and Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation opening brief due 09/12/2019. Appellees Gavin Newsom and State of California answering brief due 10/15/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11362528] (RT) [Entered: 07/12/2019 04:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
