Lisa Washington v. Diana Deleon, et al
| DIANA DELEON, JANET NAPOLITANO, in her official capacity as President of the University of California Berkeley, FULL STEAM STAFFING, LLC, UNION CITY CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, JEHOVAH'S WITNESS NATIONAL ORGANIZATION, MINDY OONG, THE REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, in her official capacity as President of the University of California Berkeley, REBECCA OLSEN, ALLSTATE CORPORATION, MICHAEL BARNES, CAROL T. CHRIST, in her official capacity as Chancellor of the University of California Berkeley, KNOX RICKSEN, LLP, GREGORY D. PIKE, Esquire, DOREEN CARR, TRANSPORTATION BROKERAGE SPECIALISTS, INC., AMANDA M. PLOWMAN, ELIZABETH THRONE, AMAZON, MARY OAKLUND, WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, NORA AUNG, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, NONA WASHINGTON, M. BRETT BURNS, DENTONS US, LLP, JEFFREY V. ROCHA, Esquire and EVEREST LEAP, LLC |
| LISA WASHINGTON |
| 19-16457 |
| July 24, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MANDATE ISSUED. (AWT, MDS and MBC) [11602736] (RL) [Entered: 02/20/2020 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN) Appellant filed a timely motion for reconsideration of the courts September 4, 2019 order dismissing this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, appellants motion for an extension of time to file a motion for reconsideration (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is denied as moot. Appellants motion for reconsideration (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. Appellants motion to stay issuance of the mandate (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is denied. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(d); 9th Cir. R. 41-1. The mandate shall issue in due course. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case No. 19-16457. Appellants appeal from the district courts October 25, 2019 final judgment remains pending as appeal No. 19-17353. [11595580] (OC) [Entered: 02/12/2020 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 7 Supreme Court Case Info Case number: 19-6829 Filed on: 11/29/2019 Cert Petition Action 1: Denied, 01/27/2020 [11578126] (RR) [Entered: 01/29/2020 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 6 Supreme Court Case Info Case number: 19-6829 Filed on: 11/29/2019 Cert Petition Action 1: Pending [11521263] (JFF) [Entered: 12/04/2019 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Lisa Washington motion for stay of mandate pending a petition for certiorari. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/25/2019. [11480403] (RL) [Entered: 10/28/2019 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Lisa Washington petition for review from the order of Sept. 4, 2019 made by Northern District of California Oakland. Deficiencies: None. [11436391] (QDL) [Entered: 09/18/2019 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Lisa Washington motion for extension of time to file a review of order filed on Sep. 4, 2019. Deficiencies: None. [11436385] (QDL) [Entered: 09/18/2019 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11420865] (HC) [Entered: 09/04/2019 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lisa Washington opening brief due 09/20/2019. [11374786] (JMR) [Entered: 07/24/2019 10:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
