Andre Rivas v. E. Jarvis, et al
| ANDRE LAMAR RIVAS, AKA Andre L. Revis |
| D. HERNANDEZ, C. BARNET, K. CRIBBS, T. CAMPBELL, E. JARVIS, S. TORRES and S. JOHNSON |
| 19-16543 |
| August 6, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Received original and 2 copies of Appellant Andre Lamar Rivas opening brief (Informal: Yes) 20 pages. Served on 08/19/2019. Major deficiencies: case closed. [11420829] (KT) [Entered: 09/04/2019 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Andre Lamar Rivas motion to file a late brief. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/27/2019. [11420820] (KT) [Entered: 09/04/2019 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MF) Appeal No. 19-16543 is dismissed as duplicative of closed appeal No. 18-15415. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court for appeal No. 19-16543. [11410384] (OC) [Entered: 08/26/2019 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellees C. Barnet, T. Campbell, K. Cribbs, D. Hernandez, E. Jarvis and S. Torres Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 08/22/2019. [11406371] [19-16543] (Igra, Misha) [Entered: 08/22/2019 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Andre Lamar Rivas opening brief due 08/26/2019. Appellees C. Barnet, T. Campbell, K. Cribbs, D. Hernandez, E. Jarvis, S. Johnson and S. Torres answering brief due 09/24/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11388952] (HC) [Entered: 08/06/2019 02:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
