BladeRoom Group Limited, et al v. Emerson Network Power Solution, et al
FACEBOOK, INC., LIEBERT CORPORATION and EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. |
EMERSON NETWORK POWER SOLUTIONS, INC. |
BRIPCO (UK) LIMITED and BLADEROOM GROUP LIMITED |
19-16584 |
August 12, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: These cases are NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Counsel may contact circuit mediator to discuss services available through the court's mediation program, to request a settlement assessment conf, or to request a stay of the appeals for settlement purposes. Also, upon agreement of the parties, the brfing sch can be modified or vacated to facilitate settlement discussions. Csl are requested to send copies of this order to their clients. Info regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [11419530] [19-16583, 19-16584, 19-16585] (CL) [Entered: 09/03/2019 04:53 PM] |
Filing 8 Added Attorney(s) Kara Fussner, Steven Holtshouser for party(s) Appellant Emerson Network Power Solutions, Inc., in case 19-16584. [11402289] (NAC) [Entered: 08/19/2019 02:28 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kara R. Fussner (Husch Blackwell, 190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600, St. Louis, MO 63105) for Appellant Emerson Network Power Solutions, Inc.. Date of service: 08/19/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11402225] [19-16584] (Fussner, Kara) [Entered: 08/19/2019 02:10 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Steven E. Holtshouser (Husch Blackwell, 190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600, St. Louis, MO 63105) for Appellant Emerson Network Power Solutions, Inc.. Date of service: 08/19/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11402204] [19-16584] (Holtshouser, Steven) [Entered: 08/19/2019 02:06 PM] |
Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/19/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11401984][19-16584] (AD) [Entered: 08/19/2019 12:44 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Emerson Network Power Solutions, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/19/2019. [11401569] [19-16584] (Telscher, Rudolph) [Entered: 08/19/2019 10:40 AM] |
Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Rudolph Telscher Jr. for party(s) Appellant Emerson Network Power Solutions, Inc., in case 19-16584. [11398532] (NAC) [Entered: 08/15/2019 01:06 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Rudolph A. Telscher, Jr. (Husch Blackwell) for Appellant Emerson Network Power Solutions, Inc.. Date of service: 08/15/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11398501] [19-16584] (Telscher, Rudolph) [Entered: 08/15/2019 12:37 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/19/2019. Transcript ordered by 09/11/2019. Transcript due 10/11/2019. Appellant Emerson Network Power Solutions, Inc. opening brief due 11/20/2019. Appellees BladeRoom Group Limited and Bripco (UK) Limited answering brief due 12/20/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11394862] (JBS) [Entered: 08/12/2019 04:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.