Timothy Wilkins v. Scott Kernan, et al
| SCOTT KERNAN, BAYONETTA, S. NELSON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WINSAUER, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and M. MARTIN |
| TIMOTHY DEANORE WILKINS |
| 19-16718 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Timothy Deanore Wilkins undated letter re: withdrawing mtn for IFP. Paper filing deficiency: No proof of service. [11443109] (RR) [Entered: 09/25/2019 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Timothy Deanore Wilkins motion for IFP. Paper filing deficiency: No proof of service. (NAN see court's order filed 9/10/19. [11443106] (RR) [Entered: 09/25/2019 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Granting Party Motion filed by Appellant Timothy Deanore Wilkins. Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). This order shall constitute the mandate. [11426600] (CKP) [Entered: 09/10/2019 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Timothy Deanore Wilkins motion to withdraw notice of appeal. Deficiencies: None. [11422680] (RR) [Entered: 09/05/2019 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Timothy Deanore Wilkins opening brief due 11/04/2019. Appellees Bayonetta, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Scott Kernan, M. Martin, S. Nelson, State of California and Winsauer answering brief due 12/04/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11418924] (RT) [Entered: 09/03/2019 02:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
