New York Hotel Trades Council, et al v. IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., et al
GREG FLEMING |
GEORGE FREDERICK WILKINSON,, BRYAN M. REASONS, IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., CAROLE BAN-MAIMON and LARRY HSU |
NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL & HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. PENSION FUND, Lead Plaintiff, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated |
19-16744 |
September 5, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL V. IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [11450238] (VS) [Entered: 10/01/2019 01:53 PM] |
Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 10/04/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11445135] (VS) [Entered: 09/26/2019 02:43 PM] |
Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/20/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11438787][19-16744] (AD) [Entered: 09/20/2019 12:44 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant New York Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Pension Fund Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/20/2019. [11438216] [19-16744] (Alexander, Susan) [Entered: 09/20/2019 08:26 AM] |
Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Andrew Love, Susan Katina Alexander for party(s) Appellant New York Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Pension Fund, in case 19-16744. [11437660] (OC) [Entered: 09/19/2019 02:50 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SVG): Due to a clerical error in the case opening process, appellate counsel for appellants were not properly listed in this Courts docket and were not served with the case opening material, including the briefing schedule. The briefing schedule issued on September 5, 2019 is therefore modified as follows: the mediation questionnaire is now due September 20, 2019. The remainder of the schedule continues in effect. The Clerk shall amend the docket to add attorneys Susan K. Alexander and Andrew S. Love as counsel for appellants. [11437649] (OC) [Entered: 09/19/2019 02:46 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/12/2019. Transcript ordered by 10/07/2019. Transcript due 11/06/2019. Appellant New York Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Pension Fund opening brief due 12/16/2019. Appellees Carole Ban-Maimon, Larry Hsu, IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., Bryan M. Reasons and George Frederick Wilkinson, answering brief due 01/16/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11422468] (RT) [Entered: 09/05/2019 02:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.