Jaime Schmidt, et al v. Superior Court of California, et al
| ELIZABETH SAMPSON, RYAN HENRIOULLE and DEBRA KNOWLES |
| JOEL DEAN |
| JAIME SCHMIDT |
| SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, County of Shasta; (erroneously sued herein as Shasta County Marshal's Office) |
| 19-16752 |
| September 6, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - AssessmentConference, 11/06/2019, 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 10/29/2019 ). [11482703] [19-16752, 19-16754] (VS) [Entered: 10/30/2019 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - AssessmentConference, 10/29/2019, 2:00 p.m., PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [11458952] [19-16752, 19-16754] (VS) [Entered: 10/09/2019 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of District Court minute order filed on 09/17/2019 - MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court's own motion and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the September 19, 2019 hearing on the Motion for Attorney Feeds [152] is VACATED and submitted without appearance and argument. The opposition or statement of non-opposition and reply due dates shall be filed in accordance with the original motion hearing date. If the Court determines that oral argument is needed it will be scheduled at a later date. Any outstanding request for telephonic appearance is denied as moot. (Deutsch, S) . [11436115] [19-16752, 19-16754] (CW) [Entered: 09/18/2019 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 10/02/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court.. [11435972] [19-16754, 19-16752] (MS) [Entered: 09/18/2019 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CJ): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, appellate proceedings other than mediation shall be held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 7 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant shall notify this court in writing of the ruling and shall advise whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11432320] (TSP) [Entered: 09/16/2019 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/13/2019. Transcript ordered by 10/07/2019. Transcript due 11/06/2019. Appellant Superior Court of California opening brief due 12/16/2019. Appellee Jaime Schmidt answering brief due 01/16/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11423879] (RT) [Entered: 09/06/2019 02:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
