Robert Piotrowski v. Charles Ryan, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT MICHAEL PIOTROWSKI
Respondent / Appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Case Number: 19-16762
Filed: September 9, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2019 Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (KMW, JHN and ADH) [11457525] (RL) [Entered: 10/08/2019 09:55 AM]
September 16, 2019 Filing 3 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and ANDREW D. HURWITZ) Appellants September 3, 2019 motion for certificate of appealability in the district court was transmitted to this court, resulting in the opening of this appeal. A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court has not issued any orders that are final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; see also Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellants petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 remains pending in the district court. DISMISSED. [11433318] (JPD) [Entered: 09/16/2019 04:56 PM]
September 11, 2019 Filing 2 Received copy of District Court order filed on 09/11/2019. ORDER - Petitioner's motion for a COA is construed as a supplement to his objection to the R&R. The Clerk of Court is directed to convert it from a motion into a supplement. [11428205] (QDL) [Entered: 09/11/2019 11:47 AM]
September 9, 2019 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. (Electronic: PACER) [11425109] (RT) [Entered: 09/09/2019 12:51 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Piotrowski v. Charles Ryan, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ROBERT MICHAEL PIOTROWSKI
Represented By: Robert Michael Piotrowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN
Represented By: Erin Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Represented By: Erin Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?