Christopher Slaight, et al v. Tata Consultancy Services
Plaintiff: BRIAN BUCHANAN and STEVEN HELDT
Petitioner: APPLE, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: NOBEL MANDILI, CHRISTOPHER SLAIGHT and SEYED AMIR MASOUDI
Defendant / Appellee: TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, LTD.
Amicus Curiae: MARIA L. ONTIVEROS, Esquire, Professor
Case Number: 19-16806
Filed: September 16, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 8, 2021 CHRISTOPHER SLAIGHT V. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MANDATE ISSUED.(SRT, MMS and MSB) [11987768] (QDL) [Entered: 02/01/2021 10:46 AM]
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 57 Terminated Laura Ann Wytsma for Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. in 19-16806 (due to incorrect ECF contact information) [11957062] (RY) [Entered: 01/08/2021 12:06 PM]
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 56 Terminated Erin M. Smith for Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. in 19-16806 (due to incorrect ECF contact information) [11957060] (RY) [Entered: 01/08/2021 12:04 PM]
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 55 Filed clerk order: The amicus brief [ # 14 ] submitted by Maria L. Ontiveros, Esquire is filed. No paper copies are required at this time. [11956959] (KWG) [Entered: 01/08/2021 11:29 AM]
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 54 FILED MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION WITH DISSENT (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARY M. SCHROEDER and MARSHA S. BERZON) AFFIRMED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [11956771] (MM) [Entered: 01/08/2021 10:25 AM]
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 53 Filed text clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AF): The motion of Professor Maria L. Ontiveros for leave to file brief as amicus curiae, Dkt. [ # 14 ], is granted. [11956760] (AF) [Entered: 01/08/2021 10:21 AM]
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARY M. SCHROEDER and MARSHA S. BERZON. [11902142] (SME) [Entered: 11/20/2020 10:58 PM]
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 51 Filed Audio recording of oral argument. Note: Video recordings of public argument calendars are available on the Court's website, at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/ [11900604] (TG) [Entered: 11/20/2020 09:41 AM]
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 50 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Daniel Kotchen for Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight. Hearing in San Francisco on 11/19/2020 at 1:00 P.M. (Courtroom: 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 10/22/2020. [11867994] [19-16806] (Kotchen, Daniel) [Entered: 10/22/2020 07:09 AM]
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 49 Notice of Oral Argument on Thursday, November 19, 2020 - 1:00 P.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location, even if the argument is fully remote. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, any argument may be held remotely with all of the judges and attorneys appearing by video or telephone. Travel to a courthouse will not be required. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument, the Clerk's Office will be in contact with you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 21 days before Thursday, November 19, 2020. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[11845129]. [19-16806] (AW) [Entered: 10/02/2020 09:40 AM]
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 48 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Laurie J. Hepler for Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.. Hearing in San Francisco on 11/19/2020 at 1:30 P.M. (Courtroom: 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 10/02/2020. [11845017] [19-16806] (Hepler, Laurie) [Entered: 10/02/2020 09:09 AM]
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 47 Notice of Oral Argument on Thursday, November 19, 2020 - 1:30 P.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location, even if the argument is fully remote. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, any argument may be held remotely with all of the judges and attorneys appearing by video or telephone. Travel to a courthouse will not be required. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument, the Clerk's Office will be in contact with you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 21 days before Thursday, November 19, 2020. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[11844658]. [19-16806] (AW) [Entered: 10/01/2020 04:40 PM]
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 46 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Laurie J. Hepler for Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.. Hearing in San Francisco on 11/19/2020 at 09:30 A.M. (Courtroom: 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 09/29/2020. [11840494] [19-16806] (Hepler, Laurie) [Entered: 09/29/2020 10:24 AM]
September 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 45 Notice of Oral Argument on Thursday, November 19, 2020 - 09:30 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location, even if the argument is fully remote. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, any argument may be held remotely with all of the judges and attorneys appearing by video or telephone. Travel to a courthouse will not be required. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument, the Clerk's Office will be in contact with you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 21 days before Thursday, November 19, 2020. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[11814763]. [19-16806] (AW) [Entered: 09/06/2020 06:17 AM]
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 44 Filed (ECF) Attorney Laurie J. Hepler for Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 08/03/2020. [11774975] [19-16806] (Hepler, Laurie) [Entered: 08/03/2020 12:24 PM]
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 43 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for November 2020 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[11770634]. [19-16806] (AW) [Entered: 07/29/2020 12:01 PM]
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 42 Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 34 ] filed by Appellants. [11765270] (SD) [Entered: 07/24/2020 12:54 PM]
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 41 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 24 ] filed by Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.. [11763791] (SD) [Entered: 07/23/2020 01:34 PM]
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 40 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 10 ] filed by Appellants. [11763781] (SD) [Entered: 07/23/2020 01:32 PM]
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 39 Received 3 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 25 ] in 3 volume(s) filed by Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. [11762804]--[Edited 07/22/2020 by LA to note supplemental]--[Edited 07/23/2020 by LA to correct link to excerpts] (LA) [Entered: 07/22/2020 05:16 PM]
July 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 38 Received 3 paper copies of further excerpts of record [ # 35 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellants. [11756771] (LA) [Entered: 07/17/2020 12:29 PM]
July 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 37 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 11 ] in 4 volume(s) filed by Appellants. [11756770] (LA) [Entered: 07/17/2020 12:28 PM]
July 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 36 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 34 ] submitted by Appellants is filed. The further excerpts of record [ # 35 ] submitted by Appellants are filed. The Court previously filed the opening and answering briefs [ # 10 ], [ # 24 ] and excerpts of record and supplemental excerpts of record [ # 11 ], [ # 25 ] submitted by Appellants and Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. Within 7 days of this order, the filer of each brief is ordered to file 6 copies of that brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. The Form 18 certificate is available on the Court's website at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form18.pdf . The covers of the opening brief must be blue. The covers of the answering brief must be red. The covers of the reply brief must be gray. Within 7 days of this order, the filer of each set of excerpts of record is ordered to file 3 copies of that set of excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. The address for regular U.S. mail is P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939. The address for overnight mail is 95 Seventh Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1526. [11751305] (LA) [Entered: 07/13/2020 04:34 PM]
July 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 35 Submitted (ECF) further excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight. Date of service: 07/10/2020. [11749707] [19-16806] (Kotchen, Daniel) [Entered: 07/10/2020 09:14 PM]
July 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 34 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight. Date of service: 07/10/2020. [11749705] [19-16806] (Kotchen, Daniel) [Entered: 07/10/2020 09:10 PM]
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 33 Filed (ECF) Attorney Laurie J. Hepler for Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 06/26/2020. [11734654] [19-16806] (Hepler, Laurie) [Entered: 06/26/2020 09:50 AM]
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 32 Terminated Patrick Downes for Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. in 19-16806 [11734423] (CW) [Entered: 06/26/2020 07:05 AM]
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 31 Filed (ECF) Notice of withdrawal of counsel. Filed by Attorney Patrick Downes for Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.. Party proceeding without counsel: No. Date of service: 06/26/2020. [11734415] [19-16806] (Downes, Patrick) [Entered: 06/26/2020 06:03 AM]
June 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 30 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for October 2020 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[11730220]. [19-16806] (AW) [Entered: 06/23/2020 09:01 AM]
June 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 29 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for September 2020 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[11730193]. [19-16806] (AW) [Entered: 06/23/2020 08:51 AM]
May 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Streamlined request [27] by Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: the optional reply brief is due 07/10/2020. [11697380] (DLM) [Entered: 05/20/2020 06:20 PM]
May 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight. New requested due date is 07/10/2020. [11696814] [19-16806] (Kotchen, Daniel) [Entered: 05/20/2020 12:41 PM]
May 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 24 ] and supplemental excerpts of record [ # 25 ] submitted by Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. are filed. No paper copies are required at this time. [11696788] (LA) [Entered: 05/20/2020 12:21 PM]
May 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.. Date of service: 05/20/2020. [11696482] [19-16806] (Hepler, Laurie) [Entered: 05/20/2020 09:51 AM]
May 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.. Date of service: 05/20/2020. [11696465] [19-16806] (Hepler, Laurie) [Entered: 05/20/2020 09:44 AM]
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): Granting Opposed Motion [ # 17 ] (ECF Filing) filed by Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.; Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. answering brief due 05/21/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11600487] (GS) [Entered: 02/18/2020 03:12 PM]
February 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Filed (ECF) Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. reply to response (motion to extend time to file brief). Date of service: 02/12/2020. [11594744] [19-16806] (Hepler, Laurie) [Entered: 02/12/2020 11:16 AM]
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Received 6 paper copies of Amicus Brief [ # 14 ] filed by Maria L. Ontiveros, Esquire. [11591254] (SD) [Entered: 02/10/2020 11:39 AM]
February 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Filed (ECF) Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight response opposing motion ([ # 17 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 17 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 02/05/2020. [11586647] [19-16806] (Kotchen, Daniel) [Entered: 02/05/2020 01:35 PM]
February 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Added Attorney(s) Daniel Kotchen for party(s) Appellant Christopher Slaight Appellant Seyed Amir Masoudi Appellant Nobel Mandili, in case 19-16806. [11584799] (CW) [Entered: 02/04/2020 12:02 PM]
February 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Daniel Kotchen (Kotchen & Low LLP, 1745 Kalorama Road NW, Suite 101, Washington, DC 20009) for Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight. Date of service: 02/04/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11584691] [19-16806] (Kotchen, Daniel) [Entered: 02/04/2020 11:35 AM]
February 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 05/21/2020. Date of service: 02/04/2020. [11584654] [19-16806] (Hepler, Laurie) [Entered: 02/04/2020 11:28 AM]
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): Motion [ # 14 ] (ECF Filing) is referred to panel.; Motion (ECF Filing) motion to become amicus is referred to panel. (see attached PDF for complete order addressing Dkt No. 14) [11583201] (GS) [Entered: 02/03/2020 02:53 PM]
January 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Entered appearance of Amicus Curiae - Pending Professor Maria L. Ontiveros. [11581555] (LA) [Entered: 01/31/2020 04:32 PM]
January 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Submitted (ECF) Amicus brief for review and filed Motion to become amicus curiae. Submitted by Professor Maria L. Ontiveros. Date of service: 01/29/2020. [11578350] [19-16806] (Young, Jeffrey) [Entered: 01/29/2020 01:34 PM]
January 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 14 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) Amicus brief for review (by government or with consent per FRAP 29(a)). Submitted by Professor Maria L. Ontiveros. Date of service: 01/29/2020. [11578211] [19-16806] (Young, Jeffrey) [Entered: 01/29/2020 12:24 PM]
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 10 ] and excerpts of record [ # 11 ] submitted by Appellants are filed. No paper copies are required at this time. [11574023] (LA) [Entered: 01/24/2020 03:02 PM]
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight. Date of service: 01/22/2020. [11571153] [19-16806]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDF of Vol 1. 01/24/2020 by LA] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 01/22/2020 09:47 PM]
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight. Date of service: 01/22/2020. [11571152] [19-16806] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 01/22/2020 09:44 PM]
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Streamlined request [8] by Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight opening brief due 01/22/2020. Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. answering brief due 02/21/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11501644] (DLM) [Entered: 11/18/2019 09:23 AM]
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight. New requested due date is 01/22/2020. [11501440] [19-16806] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 11/18/2019 07:27 AM]
October 9, 2019 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [11459215] (VS) [Entered: 10/09/2019 11:12 AM]
September 25, 2019 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 10/09/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11443129] (BLS) [Entered: 09/25/2019 10:37 AM]
September 23, 2019 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/23/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11440653][19-16806] (AD) [Entered: 09/23/2019 12:44 PM]
September 23, 2019 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/23/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11440652][19-16806] (AD) [Entered: 09/23/2019 12:44 PM]
September 23, 2019 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/23/2019. [11440575] [19-16806] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 09/23/2019 12:08 PM]
September 23, 2019 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/23/2019. [11440473] [19-16806] (Hepler, Laurie) [Entered: 09/23/2019 11:40 AM]
September 16, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/23/2019. Transcript ordered by 10/15/2019. Transcript due 11/12/2019. Appellants Nobel Mandili, Seyed Amir Masoudi and Christopher Slaight opening brief due 12/23/2019. Appellee Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. answering brief due 01/23/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11432219] (RT) [Entered: 09/16/2019 09:52 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Christopher Slaight, et al v. Tata Consultancy Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRIAN BUCHANAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEVEN HELDT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: NOBEL MANDILI
Represented By: Daniel L. Low Esquire
Represented By: Daniel Kotchen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHRISTOPHER SLAIGHT
Represented By: Daniel L. Low Esquire
Represented By: Daniel Kotchen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SEYED AMIR MASOUDI
Represented By: Daniel L. Low Esquire
Represented By: Daniel Kotchen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, LTD.
Represented By: Laurie J. Hepler Esquire
Represented By: Laura Ann Wytsma Esquire
Represented By: Erin M. Smith
Represented By: Michelle La Mar
Represented By: Bernard R. Given II
Represented By: Patrick Downes
Represented By: William Michael Brody Esquire I
Represented By: Laurie J. Hepler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: APPLE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: MARIA L. ONTIVEROS, Esquire, Professor
Represented By: Jeffrey Neil Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?