Angelina Nunes, et al v. Carrie Stephens, et al
| COUNTY OF STANISLAUS and CARRIE STEPHENS |
| L.X., a minor, D.X., a minor, ANGELINA NUNES, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for her minor children D.X. and L.X. and EMANUEL ALVES |
| ARATA, SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & GOODWIN (PLC), AMANDA J. HEITLINGER and BRAD J. SWINGLE |
| 19-16815 |
| September 17, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11470272] [19-16815, 19-16816] (BLS) [Entered: 10/18/2019 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 10/15/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11448041] (BLS) [Entered: 09/30/2019 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/25/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11443437][19-16815] (AD) [Entered: 09/25/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellees Emanuel Alves, D.X., L.X. and Angelina Nunes Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/25/2019. [11443194] [19-16815] (Powell, Robert) [Entered: 09/25/2019 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/20/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11439654][19-16815] (AD) [Entered: 09/20/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Arata, Swingle, Van Egmond & Goodwin (PLC), Brad J. Swingle and Amanda J. Heitlinger Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/20/2019. [11439042] [19-16815] (Rivera, Jesse) [Entered: 09/20/2019 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/24/2019. Transcript ordered by 10/15/2019. Transcript due 11/12/2019. Appellants Arata, Swingle, Van Egmond & Goodwin (PLC), Amanda J. Heitlinger and Brad J. Swingle opening brief due 12/23/2019. Appellees Emanuel Alves, D.X., L.X. and Angelina Nunes answering brief due 01/21/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11433760] (JBS) [Entered: 09/17/2019 09:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
