Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
| LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, LG CHEM AMERICA, INC., SANYO ELECTRIC CO, LTD, HITACHI, LTD., SONY ENERGY DEVICES CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION, SONY CORPORATION, NEC TOKIN CORPORATION, TOSHIBA CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI CO. LTD., SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., MAXWELL CORPORATION OF AMERICA and NEC CORPORATION |
| INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS |
| In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION |
| GORDON B. MORGAN |
| 19-16855 |
| September 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Attorneys Dylan I. Ballard, Gary Halling, James McGinnis, Nadezhda Nikonova, Michael W. Scarborough substituted by Attorneys John Roberti and Andrew Rhys Davies. [11495723] (RL) [Entered: 11/12/2019 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Andrew Rhys Davies (Allen & Overy LLP, 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020) for Appellees Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.. Substitution for Dylan I. Ballard for Appellees Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., Gary Halling, Esquire for Appellees Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., James McGinnis for Appellees Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., Nadezhda Nikonova for Appellees Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd. and Michael W. Scarborough for Appellees Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.. Date of service: 11/11/2019. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11495118] [19-16855] (Davies, Andrew Rhys) [Entered: 11/11/2019 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of John Roberti (Allen & Overy LLP, 1101 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005) for Appellees Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.. Substitution for Dylan I. Ballard for Appellees Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., Gary Halling, Esquire for Appellees Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., James McGinnis for Appellees Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., Nadezhda Nikonova for Appellees Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd. and Michael W. Scarborough for Appellees Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.. Date of service: 11/11/2019. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11495112] [19-16855] (Roberti, John) [Entered: 11/11/2019 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [11472424] (VS) [Entered: 10/22/2019 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 10/16/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11450989] (VS) [Entered: 10/02/2019 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/24/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11442654][19-16855] (AD) [Entered: 09/24/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Robert Clore for party(s) Appellant Gordon B. Morgan. [11442244] (RL) [Entered: 09/24/2019 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Christopher Andres Bandas for party(s) Appellant Gordon B. Morgan. [11442237] (RL) [Entered: 09/24/2019 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Christopher Andres Bandas (Bandas Law Firm, 500 North Shoreline Blvd. Suite 1020, Corpus Christi, Texas 78401) for Appellant Gordon B. Morgan. Date of service: 09/24/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11441947] [19-16855] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 09/24/2019 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Gordon B. Morgan Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/24/2019. [11441828] [19-16855] (Clore, Robert) [Entered: 09/24/2019 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Robert William Clore (Bandas Law Firm, P.C., 500 North Shoreline Blvd. Suite 1020, Corpus Christi, Texas 78401) for Appellant Gordon B. Morgan. Date of service: 09/24/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11441495] [19-16855] (Clore, Robert) [Entered: 09/24/2019 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/27/2019. Transcript ordered by 10/21/2019. Transcript due 11/18/2019. Appellant Gordon B. Morgan opening brief due 12/30/2019. Appellees Hitachi Maxwell, Ltd., Hitachi, Ltd., Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, LG Chem America, Inc., LG Chem, Ltd., Maxwell Corporation of America, NEC Corporation, NEC Tokin Corporation, Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., Sanyo Electric Co, Ltd, Sanyo North America Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Energy Devices Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba Corporation answering brief due 01/30/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11439601] (RT) [Entered: 09/20/2019 04:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.