Jerry Proffitt v. Superior Court of California,, et al
Defendant / Appellee: ERIC LITTLE, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SHASTA COUNTY, SCOTT MAYBERRY, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, SHASTA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ALLEN LONG, JACQUELINE DUNN and REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant: JERRY DANIEL PROFFITT
Case Number: 19-16856
Filed: September 23, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2019 Filing 8 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, WAF and JBR) [11498540] (RL) [Entered: 11/14/2019 08:59 AM]
October 23, 2019 Filing 7 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the August 23, 2019 magistrate judge order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11475300] (OC) [Entered: 10/23/2019 03:54 PM]
October 17, 2019 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Jerry Daniel Proffitt letter dated 10/13/2019 re: Questions concerning case and pending motions. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11471958] (RL) [Entered: 10/21/2019 04:01 PM]
October 11, 2019 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Jerry Daniel Proffitt proof of service (Opening brief. No brief filed). Dated 10/08/2019. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11465132] (RL) [Entered: 10/15/2019 08:32 PM]
October 4, 2019 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Jerry Daniel Proffitt FORM 27 motion for the US District to hear crim. and civil case. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/30/2019. [11455127] (RL) [Entered: 10/04/2019 03:51 PM]
October 4, 2019 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Jerry Daniel Proffitt FORM 24 motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/30/2019. [11455120] (RL) [Entered: 10/04/2019 03:47 PM]
October 4, 2019 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Jerry Daniel Proffitt FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/30/2019. [11455113] (RL) [Entered: 10/04/2019 03:46 PM]
September 23, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jerry Daniel Proffitt opening brief due 11/18/2019. [11440767] (JPD) [Entered: 09/23/2019 02:29 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jerry Proffitt v. Superior Court of California,, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ERIC LITTLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SHASTA COUNTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SCOTT MAYBERRY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHASTA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ALLEN LONG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JACQUELINE DUNN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JERRY DANIEL PROFFITT
Represented By: Jerry Daniel Proffitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?