Syed Ali v. ServiceNow, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: SERVICENOW, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: SYED NAZIM ALI
Case Number: 19-16871
Filed: September 25, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 9, 2020 SYED ALI V. SERVICENOW, INC.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2020 Filing 14 MANDATE ISSUED. (MHM, MBC and BSB) [11647707] (RR) [Entered: 03/31/2020 04:06 PM]
March 9, 2020 Filing 13 FILED MEMORANDUM (MARY H. MURGUIA, MORGAN B. CHRISTEN and BRIDGET S. BADE) We do not consider documents not presented to the district court. See United States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, defendants motion to strike is denied as unnecessary. AFFIRMED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [11622344] (JN) [Entered: 03/09/2020 10:33 AM]
February 13, 2020 Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellee ServiceNow, Inc. reply to response (). Date of service: 02/13/2020. [11596723] [19-16871] (Tenhoff, Gregory) [Entered: 02/13/2020 01:53 PM]
February 6, 2020 Filing 11 Filed Appellant Mr. Syed Nazim Ali response opposing motion to strike portion of Appellant's Reply Brief. Served on 02/01/2020. [11588272] (QDL) [Entered: 02/06/2020 02:13 PM]
January 29, 2020 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellee ServiceNow, Inc. Motion to strike portion of Appellant's Reply Brief. Date of service: 01/29/2020. [11577980] [19-16871] (Tenhoff, Gregory) [Entered: 01/29/2020 10:54 AM]
December 31, 2019 Filing 9 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant Mr. Syed Nazim Ali (Informal: No) reply brief of 22 pages.. Served on 12/28/2019. [11550061] (SML) [Entered: 01/03/2020 11:09 AM]
December 26, 2019 Filing 8 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 4 ] filed by ServiceNow, Inc.. [11544424] (DB) [Entered: 12/26/2019 02:17 PM]
December 26, 2019 Filing 7 Received 3 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 5 ] in 4 volume(s) filed by Appellee ServiceNow, Inc. [11544128] (SML) [Entered: 12/26/2019 10:52 AM]
December 23, 2019 Filing 6 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 4 ] submitted by ServiceNow, Inc. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The supplemental excerpts of record [ # 5 ] submitted by ServiceNow, Inc. are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11542843] (SML) [Entered: 12/23/2019 04:29 PM]
December 23, 2019 Filing 5 Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellee ServiceNow, Inc.. Date of service: 12/23/2019. [11542695] [19-16871] (Tenhoff, Gregory) [Entered: 12/23/2019 03:46 PM]
December 23, 2019 Filing 4 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee ServiceNow, Inc.. Date of service: 12/23/2019. [11542652] [19-16871] (Tenhoff, Gregory) [Entered: 12/23/2019 03:33 PM]
October 2, 2019 Filing 3 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant Mr. Syed Nazim Ali (Informal: No) opening brief of 19 pages. Served on 09/28/2019. [11452947] (SML) [Entered: 10/03/2019 12:08 PM]
October 1, 2019 Filing 2 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 10/01/2019. [11450311] (RT) [Entered: 10/01/2019 02:15 PM]
September 25, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Syed Nazim Ali opening brief due 11/25/2019. Appellee ServiceNow, Inc. answering brief due 12/23/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11442976] (JBS) [Entered: 09/25/2019 09:37 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Syed Ali v. ServiceNow, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SERVICENOW, INC.
Represented By: Gregory Clayton Tenhoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SYED NAZIM ALI
Represented By: Syed Nazim Ali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?