Curtis Jackson v. Carmelino Galang, et al
| EVALYN HOROWITZ, M.D. MCSP, DAVID SMILEY, CEO MCSP, NIKOLAJ WOLFSON, M.D. SJGH, CARMELINO L. GALANG, M.D. SJGH and SAM WONG-DO, M.D. MCSP |
| CURTIS VAUGHN JACKSON |
| M. DATOR |
| 19-16879 |
| September 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, WAF and JBR) [11498472] (QDL) [Entered: 11/14/2019 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); see also Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11474961] (JMR) [Entered: 10/23/2019 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Curtis Vaughn Jackson opening brief due 11/18/2019. Appellee M. Dator answering brief due 12/18/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11443161] (JMR) [Entered: 09/25/2019 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
