Francis Grandinetti, II v. Stanton Oshiro, et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Francis Grandinetti, II v. Stanton Oshiro, et al

Francis Grandinetti, II v. Stanton Oshiro, et al

Plaintiff / Appellant:	FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Defendant / Appellee:	SHELLEY HARRINGTON, LAURIE NADAMOTO, LAW OFFICE OF STANTON OSHIRO (HILO), doing legal representation in the State of Hawaii and elsewhere (exilees); All office staff, witnesses, parties, informants, and supervisory officials and STANTON C. OSHIRO, Esq., HSBA 4009
Case Number:	19-16943
Filed:	October 2, 2019
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
October 25, 2019	Filing 2 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) This court has reviewed the notice of appeal filed September 27, 2019 in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 06-80108. Because the appeal is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review, it shall not be permitted to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 19-16943 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the District of Hawaii, shall constitute the mandate of this court. No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained. DISMISSED. [11477572] (OC) [Entered: 10/25/2019 09:17 AM]
October 2, 2019	Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 06-80108. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [11451543] (RT) [Entered: 10/02/2019 12:42 PM]

Date Filed

Document Text

October 25, 2019

Filing 2 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) This court has reviewed the notice of appeal filed September 27, 2019 in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 06-80108. Because the appeal is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review, it shall not be permitted to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 19-16943 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the District of Hawaii, shall constitute the mandate of this court. No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained. DISMISSED. [11477572] (OC) [Entered: 10/25/2019 09:17 AM]

October 2, 2019

Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 06-80108. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [11451543] (RT) [Entered: 10/02/2019 12:42 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Francis Grandinetti, II v. Stanton Oshiro, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Represented By:	Francis Anthony Grandinetti II
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHELLEY HARRINGTON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LAURIE NADAMOTO
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LAW OFFICE OF STANTON OSHIRO (HILO), doing legal representation in the State of Hawaii and elsewhere (exilees); All office staff, witnesses, parties, informants, and supervisory officials
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STANTON C. OSHIRO, Esq., HSBA 4009
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?