Brandon Harvey v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LL, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: TRACY CHEN, Proposed Intervenor-Plaintiffs and MATHEW LUCADANO
Plaintiff / Appellee: BRANDON HARVEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
Case Number: 19-16955
Filed: October 3, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 15, 2022 BRANDON HARVEY V. MORGAN STANLEY LLC

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2019 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11479589] (BLS) [Entered: 10/28/2019 11:00 AM]
October 11, 2019 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 10/25/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11462525] (BLS) [Entered: 10/11/2019 03:35 PM]
October 10, 2019 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/10/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11461323][19-16955] (AD) [Entered: 10/10/2019 06:44 PM]
October 10, 2019 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/10/2019. [11461280] [19-16955] (Livingston, Andrew) [Entered: 10/10/2019 05:11 PM]
October 9, 2019 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/08/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11458719][19-16955] (AD) [Entered: 10/09/2019 06:44 AM]
October 8, 2019 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Mathew Lucadano and Tracy Chen Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/08/2019. [11458694] [19-16955] (Sagafi, Jahan) [Entered: 10/08/2019 07:25 PM]
October 3, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/10/2019. Transcript ordered by 10/31/2019. Transcript due 12/02/2019. Appellants Tracy Chen and Mathew Lucadano opening brief due 01/09/2020. Appellees Brandon Harvey and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC answering brief due 02/10/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11453460] (RT) [Entered: 10/03/2019 03:18 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Brandon Harvey v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LL, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: TRACY CHEN, Proposed Intervenor-Plaintiffs
Represented By: Christopher McNerney
Represented By: Relic Sun
Represented By: Jahan C. Sagafi
Represented By: Laura Sullivan
Represented By: Mark Humenik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: MATHEW LUCADANO
Represented By: Christopher McNerney
Represented By: Relic Sun
Represented By: Jahan C. Sagafi
Represented By: Laura Sullivan
Represented By: Mark Humenik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: BRANDON HARVEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Marita Murphy Lauinger
Represented By: Edward Wynne
Represented By: David S. Markun
Represented By: James F. Clapp Esquire
Represented By: Jeffrey K. Compton
Represented By: George Nemiroff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
Represented By: Lynne C. Hermle
Represented By: Andrew Livingston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?