Wondiyrad Kabede v. State of California Court's, et al
| ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and STATE OF CALIFORNIA COURT'S |
| WONDIYRAD KABEDE |
| 19-16988 |
| October 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Wondiyrad Kabede letter dated 11/14/2019 re: wrong date on previous motion, letter to the state. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11502601] (NAC) [Entered: 11/18/2019 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (JEROME FARRIS and M. MARGARET MCKEOWN) The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012). In order for a district court to consider a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition, this court must first authorize the district court to consider that petition. See 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3). The Clerk shall serve this order and a copy of the standard form application for leave to file a second or successive petition on appellant. Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11502274] (HC) [Entered: 11/18/2019 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Wondiyrad Kabede miscellaneous motion; necessary and an important information the Court needs to be aware. Deficiencies: None. [11496410] (NAC) [Entered: 11/12/2019 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Wondiyrad Kabede letter dated 10/16/2019 re: Parole Board Hearing. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11471467] (NAC) [Entered: 10/21/2019 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 09/23/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11457612] (JMR) [Entered: 10/08/2019 10:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
