Juan Montenegro Flores v. David Baughman, et al
| SCOTT KERNAN |
| JUAN MANUEL MONTENEGRO FLORES |
| DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden |
| 19-16995 |
| October 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Juan Manuel Montenegro Flores response to order to show cause. [11488257] (NAC) [Entered: 11/04/2019 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KMB): The record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the request for certificate of appealability because the notice of appeal was not filed or deposited for mailing in the prisons internal mail system within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment on August 15, 2019. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (c). Within 21 days after this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of this request for certificate of appealability or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of appellants memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this request for certificate of appealability pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [11461249] (RT) [Entered: 10/10/2019 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 08/15/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. (Electronic: PACER) [11459508] (RT) [Entered: 10/09/2019 01:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
