Anthony Sharp v. Audrey King, et al
| ANTHONY ANDRE SHARP |
| COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, AUDREY KING, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BRANDON PRICE, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and PETE WILSON |
| 19-17019 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): On October 16, 2019, this court issued an order staying appellate proceedings pending disposition of the motion for reconsideration in the district court. On November 6, 2019, the district court denied the motion. The stay order filed October 16, 2019, is lifted and this appeal shall proceed. The briefing schedule is stayed pending resolution of appellants motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel, which will be addressed by separate order. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [11518835] (CKP) [Entered: 12/03/2019 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 6 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Anthony Andre Sharp second opening brief (Informal: Yes) of 6 pages. Served on 11/17/2019. Major deficiencies: proceedings held in abeyance, motions pending, second opening brief submitted without a motion to file a supplemental or substitute brief. [11509818] (LA) [Entered: 11/22/2019 05:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Anthony Andre Sharp motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11509654] (RR) [Entered: 11/22/2019 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Anthony Andre Sharp motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11509642] (RR) [Entered: 11/22/2019 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Anthony Andre Sharp's opening brief (Informal: Yes) of 8 pages. Served on 10/06/2019. Major deficiencies: proceedings held in abeyance. [11471181] (LA) [Entered: 10/21/2019 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely-filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), and that motion is still pending in the district court. The October 9, 2019 notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending September 18, 2019 motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 14 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant shall file a written notice in this court: (1) informing this court of the district courts ruling; and (2) stating whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11466661] (CKP) [Entered: 10/16/2019 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Anthony Andre Sharp opening brief due 12/09/2019. (No appearance for Appellees, no answering brief deadlines set) [11461694] (HC) [Entered: 10/11/2019 10:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
