Matthew Lawrie v. D. Williams, et al
| MATTHEW ALAN LAWRIE |
| M. MARQUEZ, Correctional Officer at Kern Valley State Prison, D. YBARRA, Correctional Officer at Kern Valley State Prison, RIOS, Correctional Officer at Kern Valley State Prison and D. WILLIAMS, Sergeant at Kern Valley State Prison |
| 19-17044 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Matthew Alan Lawrie opening brief (Informal: Yes) 6 pages. Served on 11/12/2019. Major deficiencies: motions pending. [11506757] (KT) [Entered: 11/21/2019 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Matthew Alan Lawrie motion to bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/11/2019. [11504200] (JFF) [Entered: 11/19/2019 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Matthew Alan Lawrie motion for temporary restraining order. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/11/2019. [11504187] (JFF) [Entered: 11/19/2019 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Matthew Alan Lawrie motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/22/2019. [11480453] (JFF) [Entered: 10/28/2019 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11467923] (CKP) [Entered: 10/17/2019 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Matthew Alan Lawrie opening brief due 12/06/2019. (No appearance for Appellees, no answering brief deadlines set) [11466688] (HC) [Entered: 10/16/2019 03:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
