Ashley Walrath v. William Doan, et al
| WILLIAM DOAN |
| JACKIE BLAIR, FRANK WINCHELL and SHAE MALONEY |
| ASHLEY M. WALRATH |
| 19-17059 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (JAY S. BYBEE, SANDRA S. IKUTA and JOHN B. OWENS) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(d); Kunzi v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 833 F.2d 1291, 1293 (9th Cir. 1987) (order remanding a removed action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not reviewable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11509615] (OC) [Entered: 11/22/2019 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellee Ashley M. Walrath motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/22/2019. [11479792] (RL) [Entered: 10/28/2019 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [11479790] (RL) [Entered: 10/28/2019 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant William Doan opening brief due 12/18/2019. Appellee Ashley M. Walrath answering brief due 01/21/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11467880] (RT) [Entered: 10/17/2019 11:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
