Tom Franks v. Kirk, et al
| STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT |
| WYGT, Deputy Sheriff, Modesto Public Safety Center/Jail, MAULDIN, Deputy Sheriff, Modesto Public Safety Center/Jail and KIRK, Deputy Sheriff, Modesto Public Safety Center/Jail |
| TOM MARK FRANKS |
| 19-17083 |
| October 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Received original and 6 copies of Appellant Tom Mark Franks opening brief (Informal: Yes) 6 pages. Served on 12/06/2019. Major deficiencies: briefing stayed. [11535660] (KWG) [Entered: 12/17/2019 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): This appeal No. 19-17083 challenges the district courts September 26, 2019 post-judgment order denying appellants motion for appointment of counsel. A review of the record suggests that this appeal of the district courts September 26, 2019 post-judgment order may be appropriate for summary disposition under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-6(b). See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982). Within 21 days after the filing date of this order, appellant shall show cause why summary affirmance of the district courts September 26, 2019 post-judgment order is not appropriate. A response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, this appeal will be automatically dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The briefing schedule is stayed pending further order of the court. Appellants appeal from the final judgment remains pending in docket No. 18-17237. [11508024] (CKP) [Entered: 11/21/2019 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Tom Mark Franks letter dated 10/28/2019 re: Question about paperwork received on 10/25/19. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11488391] (QDL) [Entered: 11/04/2019 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 11/18/2019. Transcript due 12/17/2019. Appellant Tom Mark Franks opening brief due 01/27/2020. Appellees Kirk, Mauldin and Wygt answering brief due 02/27/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11471557] (RT) [Entered: 10/21/2019 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
