Curtis Glawe v. Carpenter Hazlewood, et al
| MARK K. SAHL, MARK HOLMGREEN, GREGORY A. STEIN, CARPENTER, HAZLEWOOD, DELGADO & BOLEN PLC and JAVIER DELGADO |
| CURTIS G. GLAWE |
| 19-17090 |
| October 22, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CURTIS GLAWE V. CARPENTER HAZLEWOOD |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 12/10/2019. [11528526] (RT) [Entered: 12/11/2019 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): On October 29, 2019, this court issued an order staying appellate proceedings pending disposition of the October 4, 2019 motion for reconsideration in the district court. On November 13, 2019, the district court denied the motion. Appellant filed an amended notice of appeal in the district court on November 17, 2019. The stay order filed October 29, 2019, is lifted and this appeal shall proceed. A review of the district court docket reflects that appellant has not paid the docketing and filing fees for this appeal. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall: (1) file a motion with this court to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a completed Form 4 affidavit; or (2) pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and provide proof of payment to this court. The Clerk shall serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on appellant. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit Rule 27-11. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [11513149] (CKP) [Entered: 11/26/2019 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [11501914] (NAC) [Entered: 11/18/2019 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely-filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), and that motion is still pending in the district court. The October 20, 2019 notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending October 4, 2019 motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 14 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant shall file a written notice in this court: (1) informing this court of the district courts ruling; and (2) stating whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk will serve this order on the district court. [11481379] (CKP) [Entered: 10/29/2019 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 11/19/2019. Transcript due 12/19/2019. Appellant Curtis G. Glawe opening brief due 01/28/2020. Appellees Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado & Bolen PLC, Javier Delgado, Mark Holmgreen, Mark K. Sahl and Gregory A. Stein answering brief due 02/27/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11472697] (JBS) [Entered: 10/22/2019 10:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
