Edward Ray, Jr. v. L. Parreno
| L. PARRENO |
| EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr. |
| 19-17137 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS and DANIEL A. BRESS) A review of the record and motion to proceed in forma pauperis demonstrate that appellant has alleged imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ] ) is granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Because appellant is a prisoner, appellant must pay the $505 filing and docketing fees over time, if appellant wants this appeal to go forward. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), (2). If appellant wants to pay the $505 over time to allow this appeal to go forward, appellant must, within 21 days after the date of this order: (1) complete the enclosed prisoner authorization form, and (2) file the completed prisoner authorization form with this court. If appellant files the completed prisoner authorization form, prison officials will collect funds from appellants inmate trust fund account every month when there is a balance of at least $10 in appellants account, and will send those funds to the court to pay the fees for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The court will continue to collect the full $505, even after the appeal is over, whether appellant is successful on appeal or not. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), (e)(2). If appellant does not file the completed authorization form with the court within 21 days after the date of this order, the Clerk will dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief is due February 3, 2020. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, the court waives the excerpts of record requirement. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.2. As there is no appearance by appellee, briefing will be completed upon the filing of appellants opening brief. The Clerk shall serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [11539040] (JPD) [Entered: 12/19/2019 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Edward Vincent Ray, Jr. motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11504357] (JFF) [Entered: 11/19/2019 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11481616] (CKP) [Entered: 10/29/2019 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Edward Vincent Ray Jr. opening brief due 12/23/2019. [11477670] (JPD) [Entered: 10/25/2019 09:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Edward Ray, Jr. v. L. Parreno | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: L. PARRENO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Edward Vincent Ray Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
