Mark Rogers v. James Dzurenda, et al
| ADAM PAUL LAXALT, JAMES DZURENDA, MARK ROGERS and WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden |
| 19-17158 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Streamlined request [3] by Appellants James Dzurenda, William Gittere and Mr. Adam Paul Laxalt to extend time to file the brief is approved in part. Streamlined requests only allow for a 30 day extension of time to file the brief.Amended briefing schedule: Appellants James Dzurenda, William Gittere and Adam Paul Laxalt opening brief due 01/09/2020. Appellee Mark Rogers answering brief due 02/10/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11522606] (JN) [Entered: 12/05/2019 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants James Dzurenda, William Gittere and Mr. Adam Paul Laxalt. New requested due date is 01/10/2020. [11520334] [19-17158] (Perlick, Jessica) [Entered: 12/04/2019 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (RONALD M. GOULD, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and MARK J. BENNETT) The briefing schedule for this appeal is set as follows. The opening brief, not to exceed 14,000 words, and the excerpts of record are due December 10, 2019. The answering brief, not to exceed 14,000 words, is due January 22, 2020. The reply brief, not to exceed 7,000 words, is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11479933] (WL) [Entered: 10/28/2019 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. [11478569] (BY) [Entered: 10/25/2019 02:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
