Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. Amar Patel, et al
| JOSEPH W. GUZZETTA, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, ADAM N. BARASCH, MARK JOSEPH KENNEY, BERNARD KORNBERG, WILLIAM A. ASPINWALL, AMAR R. PATEL and SEVERSON & WERSON |
| FAREED SEPEHRY-FARD |
| 19-17209 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11502661] (CKP) [Entered: 11/18/2019 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 19-17209: Due] ). [11502452] (JW) [Entered: 11/18/2019 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 Received copy of District Court order filed on 11/05/2019 - appeal not taken in good faith. [11496973] (CW) [Entered: 11/13/2019 07:18 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed UNDER SEAL and EX PARTE Appellant Fareed Sepehry-Fard's motion to take judicial notice of unredacted Exhibits A, B, and C; memorandum of law; declaration. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/04/2019. [11492604] (LA) [Entered: 11/07/2019 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Fareed Sepehry-Fard's administrative motion to file unredacted Exhibits A, B, and C of concurrently filed ex parte application and request for mandatory judicial notice UNDER SEAL, and request to stay briefing schedule for 6 months due to appellant's medical conditions; memorandum of law; declaration. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/04/2019. [11492593] (LA) [Entered: 11/07/2019 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11488051] (CKP) [Entered: 11/04/2019 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Fareed Sepehry-Fard opening brief due 12/30/2019. [11484784] (JPD) [Entered: 10/31/2019 11:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
