Roberto Herrera v. D. Davey

Roberto Herrera v. D. Davey

Petitioner / Appellant:	ROBERTO HERRERA
Respondent / Appellee:	D. DAVEY
Case Number:	19-17296
Filed:	November 12, 2019
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
December 19, 2019	Filing 2 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARSHA S. BERZON and DANIEL A. BRESS) : This court has reviewed the notice of appeal filed November 7, 2019 in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 14-80082. Because the appeal is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review, it shall not be permitted to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 19-17296 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the Eastern District of California, shall constitute the mandate of this court. No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained. DISMISSED. [11538467] (RT) [Entered: 12/19/2019 11:46 AM]
November 12, 2019	Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 14-80082. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [11496581] (RT) [Entered: 11/12/2019 03:55 PM]

Date Filed

Document Text

December 19, 2019

Filing 2 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARSHA S. BERZON and DANIEL A. BRESS) : This court has reviewed the notice of appeal filed November 7, 2019 in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 14-80082. Because the appeal is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review, it shall not be permitted to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 19-17296 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the Eastern District of California, shall constitute the mandate of this court. No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained. DISMISSED. [11538467] (RT) [Entered: 12/19/2019 11:46 AM]

November 12, 2019

Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 14-80082. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [11496581] (RT) [Entered: 11/12/2019 03:55 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Roberto Herrera v. D. Davey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ROBERTO HERRERA
Represented By:	Roberto Herrera
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: D. DAVEY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?