FTC v. Jonathan Hanley, et al
| BROWN LEGAL, INC., Utah corporaton, CONSUMER DEFENSE, LLC, Utah limited liability company, AMERICAN HOME LOANS, LLC, Utah limited liability company, FMG PARTNERS, LLC, Utah limited liability company, PREFERED LAW, PLLC, Utah professional limited liability company, CONSUMER DEFENSE, LLC, Nevada limited liabilty company, AM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, Utah limited liability company, SANDRA X. HANLEY, in her individual and corporate capacity, AMERICAN HOME LOAN COUNSELORS, Utah limited liability company, CONSUMER LINK, INC., Nevada corporation, ZINLY, LLC, Utah limited liability company and CONSUMER DEFENSE GROUP, LLC, Utah limited liability company, FKA Modification Review Board, LLC |
| JONATHAN P. HANLEY, in his individual and corporate capacity |
| FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION |
| THOMAS W. MCNAMARA |
| 19-17326 |
| November 15, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11507150] (CKP) [Entered: 11/21/2019 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 12/09/2019. Transcript due 01/07/2020. Appellant Jonathan P. Hanley opening brief due 02/18/2020. Appellees Federal Trade Commission and Thomas W. McNamara answering brief due 03/18/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11501164] (RT) [Entered: 11/15/2019 04:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
