Edward David v. Eloy Ltuafte, et al
| EDWARD DAVID |
| SANDRA BOXX-FONTES, JIMMY GROVES, SUZANNA GOODMAN-FISLER and ELOY LTUAFTE |
| 19-17351 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Filed Appellant Edward David letter dated 01/08/2020 re: Request for docket sheet. Paper filing deficiency: None. (sent copy of docket sheet) [11562422] (RL) [Entered: 01/14/2020 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 14 Received original and 7 copies of Appellant Edward David's supplement to the opening brief of 1 page. Served on 12/30/2019. Major deficiencies: motion for the Court's to allow me to insert a page into the opening brief pending. [11547096] (SML) [Entered: 12/30/2019 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed Appellant Edward David motion for the Court's to allow me to insert a page into the opening brief. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/30/2019. [11547083] (SML) [Entered: 12/30/2019 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 12 Received original and 7 copies of Appellant Edward David opening brief (Informal: Yes) 10 pages. Served on 12/16/2019. Major deficiencies: motions pending. [11543124] (SML) [Entered: 12/24/2019 08:49 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed Appellant Edward David Request for copies of documents from DC, Request for docket sheet, request for rules book. Dated 12/16/2019. Paper filing deficiency: None. (Sent copy of docket sheet & rules book only) [11541754] (RL) [Entered: 12/23/2019 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 10 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11533824] (CKP) [Entered: 12/16/2019 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Edward David motion to fix clerical error. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/09/2019. [11532289] (RL) [Entered: 12/13/2019 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 8 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 12/06/2019. [Case Number 19-17351: Partially Paid] [11532285] (RL) [Entered: 12/13/2019 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Edward David FORM 24 motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/05/2019. [11527523] (RL) [Entered: 12/10/2019 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Chad Couchot for party(s) Appellee Jimmy Groves Appellee Suzanna Goodman-Fisler Appellee Sandra Boxx-Fontes Appellee Eloy Ltuafte. [11519826] (RL) [Entered: 12/03/2019 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Chad C. Couchot (Schuering Zimmerman & Doyle, LLP 400 University Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95825) for Appellees Sandra Boxx-Fontes, Suzanna Goodman-Fisler, Jimmy Groves and Eloy Ltuafte. Date of service: 12/03/2019. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11519751] [19-17351] (Couchot, Chad) [Entered: 12/03/2019 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11519469] (CKP) [Entered: 12/03/2019 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Edward David letter dated 11/25/2019 re: Seeking clarification. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11518027] (RL) [Entered: 12/02/2019 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Edward David motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/25/2019. [11512629] (RL) [Entered: 11/26/2019 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Edward David opening brief due 01/21/2020. Appellees Sandra Boxx-Fontes, Suzanna Goodman-Fisler, Jimmy Groves and Eloy Ltuafte answering brief due 02/18/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11505821] (JPD) [Entered: 11/20/2019 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
