Guillermo Trujillo v. B. Smith, et al
R. STOVALL, LT and B. SMITH, c/o |
GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO |
19-17489 |
December 12, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Guillermo Cruz Trujillo opening brief (Informal: Yes) 5 pages. Served on 12/28/2019. Major deficiencies: motions pending. [11553659] (KWG) [Entered: 01/07/2020 02:05 PM] |
Filing 6 Received Appellant Guillermo Cruz Trujillo request for copy of complaint 42 U.S.C. 1983 with ehibits. [11546694] (NAC) [Entered: 12/30/2019 01:52 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Guillermo Cruz Trujillo motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11546687] (NAC) [Entered: 12/30/2019 01:51 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Guillermo Cruz Trujillo motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11546686] (NAC) [Entered: 12/30/2019 01:50 PM] |
Filing 3 Received notice of change of address dated 12/23/2019 from Guillermo Cruz Trujillo. New address: Pelican Bay State Prison, P.O. Box 7500, Crescent City, CA 95532. [11546660] (NAC) [Entered: 12/30/2019 01:38 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Guillermo Cruz Trujillo motion to release complaint 42 U.S.C. 1983. Deficiencies: None. [11545457] (NAC) [Entered: 12/27/2019 02:34 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Guillermo Cruz Trujillo opening brief due 02/10/2020. [11529858] (JPD) [Entered: 12/12/2019 10:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.